I've dropped down to 90% in my day job. Which means that I get every other Friday off. Not that I sit at home staring at the telly. I've far too many things to be getting on with to do that.
This morning I've been soaking the labels off bottles, scanning the BBPA Statistical Handbook 2017, putting together a pre-WW I Adnams Tally Ho recipe and writing this blog post. I really need to crack on with stuff for a good reason. I'm off to South America a week tomorrow. I need to get more than a week ahead in my posts as I don't want to be messing about posting while I'm away.
I've never been to South America before so I'm pretty excited.Kristen managed to get me an invitation to Conferência de Cervejeiros in Santiago de Chile. Where I'll be doing some judging and giving a talk.
It seems that there's a lot going on in the beer world down there. I can't wait to see what they're brewing. And taste it as well, obviously. I'm sure that I'll be writing all about it as soon as I'm back.
While I'm so busy, why not buy one of my two most recent books. It might encourage me to write more:
There's never been a set set of historic homebrew recipes like it. Not just adjunct-laden,watery British beers but all sorts of weird stuff like Continental Lagers and North American Ales. Amstel's beers of the 1950's anyone??
Please buy it. It's dead good. And Andrew's shoes will need replacing soon.
http://www.lulu.com/shop/ronald-pattinson/lets-brew/paperback/product-23289812.html
And there's also my sadly neglected Scottish masterpiece:
http://www.lulu.com/shop/ronald-pattinson/scotland-vol-2/paperback/product-23090497.html
It contains a ridiculousnumber of recipes - 370-something - covering the whole range of Scottish beers from the 1840's to the 1970's.
barclayperkins
Bavarian Weizenbock
div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
Strangely, I’ve got almost as many 19th century analyses of Weizenbock as I do of standard-strength Weissbier. Isn’t that odd?
Though I’m only 100% certain about three of them. The Streicher one may be from Switzerland. I haven’t been able to track down a place called Rorsach. The closest name I can find is Rorschach in Switzerland.
One thing immediately strikes me about these beers: only one could legally be called Bock in Germany today. Because there’s a minimum OG of 16º Plato for Bockbier. Which obviously wasn’t the case in the 19th century.
The Streicher beer stands out because of the high level of acidity, making me think that it might well be a different type of Weizenbock. It’s strange to see a strongish beer that’s so acidic. The relatively high degree of attenuation might betray the presence of Brettanomyces.
You can probably guess what’s coming. Some modern Weizenbocks. It’s pretty obvious what one of the main differences is going to be.
That’s right, the OG of the modern versions is higher. As it has to be by German law. It’s about 5 OG points, or 1.1º Plato higher. That, couple with a much higher degree of attenuation adds up to much stronger beers, averaging 7.23% ABV as opposed to 5.45% ABV.
I’ve noticed before that there were few really strong beers in the 19th century in Germany. The higher OG beers often have very poor degrees of attenuation, leaving them under 6% ABV.
Strangely, I’ve got almost as many 19th century analyses of Weizenbock as I do of standard-strength Weissbier. Isn’t that odd?Though I’m only 100% certain about three of them. The Streicher one may be from Switzerland. I haven’t been able to track down a place called Rorsach. The closest name I can find is Rorschach in Switzerland.
One thing immediately strikes me about these beers: only one could legally be called Bock in Germany today. Because there’s a minimum OG of 16º Plato for Bockbier. Which obviously wasn’t the case in the 19th century.
The Streicher beer stands out because of the high level of acidity, making me think that it might well be a different type of Weizenbock. It’s strange to see a strongish beer that’s so acidic. The relatively high degree of attenuation might betray the presence of Brettanomyces.
| Bavarian Weizenbock 1866 - 1892 | |||||||||
| Year | Brewer | Beer | OG Plato | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | Acidity | |
| 1866 | Hofbräuhaus | Munich | Weisses Bockbier | 15.37 | 1062.6 | 1020 | 5.52 | 68.03% | |
| 1888 | Schramm | Munich | Weissbier Bock | 17.34 | 1071.1 | 1027.7 | 5.61 | 61.04% | 0.180 |
| 1888 | Schneider | Munich | Weissbier Bock | 14.40 | 1058.4 | 1020.8 | 4.86 | 64.38% | 0.180 |
| 1892 | Streicher | Rorsach | Weizenbock | 14.49 | 1058.8 | 1014.2 | 5.80 | 75.85% | 0.420 |
| Average | 15.40 | 1062.7 | 1020.7 | 5.45 | 67.33% | 0.260 | |||
| Source: | |||||||||
| "Handbuch der chemischen technologie mit besonderer berücksichtigung der gewerbestatistik" by Johannes Rudolf Wagner, 1875, page 614 | |||||||||
| König, J (1903), Bier in Chemie der menschlichen Nahrungs- und Genussmittel by Joseph König, 1903, pp 1101 - 1156, Julius Springer, Berlin. | |||||||||
You can probably guess what’s coming. Some modern Weizenbocks. It’s pretty obvious what one of the main differences is going to be.
| Bavarian Weizenbock in 2014 | |||||||
| Brewer | Town | Beer | OG Plato | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation |
| Weihenstephan | Freising | Vitus | 16.5 | 1067.5 | 1008.8 | 7.70 | 86.95% |
| Göller | Zeil am Main | Weizen Bock | 17.5 | 1071.8 | 1018.2 | 7.00 | 74.73% |
| Kulmbacher Brauerei | Kulmbach | Vitus | 16.5 | 1067.5 | 1008.8 | 7.70 | 86.95% |
| Brauerei Reblitz | Bad Staffelstein | Reblitz-Weizenbock | 16.1 | 1065.7 | 1010.8 | 7.20 | 83.64% |
| Kitzmann-Bräu | Erlangen | Weißbier-Bock | 16 | 1065.3 | 1011.8 | 7.00 | 81.93% |
| Brauerei Hofmann | Pahres | Weizenbock | 16.5 | 1067.5 | 1015.4 | 6.80 | 77.25% |
| Average | 16.5 | 1067.5 | 1012.3 | 7.23 | 81.91% | ||
| Sources: | |||||||
| The relevant brewery websites | |||||||
That’s right, the OG of the modern versions is higher. As it has to be by German law. It’s about 5 OG points, or 1.1º Plato higher. That, couple with a much higher degree of attenuation adds up to much stronger beers, averaging 7.23% ABV as opposed to 5.45% ABV.
I’ve noticed before that there were few really strong beers in the 19th century in Germany. The higher OG beers often have very poor degrees of attenuation, leaving them under 6% ABV.
Let’s Brew Thursday - 1945 Barclay Perkins XX
I’m almost done with watery Barclay Perkins Milds. But not quite. Just two to go.
This beer was originally brewed in July 1945, after the war in Europe had ended, but while fighting was still going on in the Pacific. Which must have seemed pretty weird. In London the blackout was finally lifted and the lights had come back on, but British servicemen were still dying in the Far East.
How does this differ from their 1944 Mild? Not very much, is the short answer. It still contains the same malt: SA malt, crystal malt and amber malt. The only difference there is that mild malt makes up most of the base. The non-malt sources of fermentables are much the same: No. 3 invert sugar and flaked barley.
The one radical departure is the inclusion of malt extract. I’m guessing the reason behind that was the enzymes, but I could be wrong. It’s such a small amount that I struggle to find another reason for its inclusion.
Other than that, the proportion of sugar has increased, from just over 9% to almost 15%. Not sure why that should be. It was too soon after the German surrender for the sugar supply to have improved. And sugar and sweets remained rationed for several more years.
Quite a lot of the hops – more than half – were from the 1942 and less than a quarter from 1944. To account for that, I’ve reduced the total hops from 1.50 ozs. to 1 oz.
This was another heavily primed beer, with the primings raising the effective OG a full four gravity points to 1035.4º. Given that there would have been a secondary fermentation in the case, the eventual strength would have been over 3% ABV.
One last note. As brewed, this beer will come out about 14 SRM. You’ll need to add more caramel to get the colour of the beer as served in the pub.
This beer was originally brewed in July 1945, after the war in Europe had ended, but while fighting was still going on in the Pacific. Which must have seemed pretty weird. In London the blackout was finally lifted and the lights had come back on, but British servicemen were still dying in the Far East.
How does this differ from their 1944 Mild? Not very much, is the short answer. It still contains the same malt: SA malt, crystal malt and amber malt. The only difference there is that mild malt makes up most of the base. The non-malt sources of fermentables are much the same: No. 3 invert sugar and flaked barley.
The one radical departure is the inclusion of malt extract. I’m guessing the reason behind that was the enzymes, but I could be wrong. It’s such a small amount that I struggle to find another reason for its inclusion.
Other than that, the proportion of sugar has increased, from just over 9% to almost 15%. Not sure why that should be. It was too soon after the German surrender for the sugar supply to have improved. And sugar and sweets remained rationed for several more years.
Quite a lot of the hops – more than half – were from the 1942 and less than a quarter from 1944. To account for that, I’ve reduced the total hops from 1.50 ozs. to 1 oz.
This was another heavily primed beer, with the primings raising the effective OG a full four gravity points to 1035.4º. Given that there would have been a secondary fermentation in the case, the eventual strength would have been over 3% ABV.
One last note. As brewed, this beer will come out about 14 SRM. You’ll need to add more caramel to get the colour of the beer as served in the pub.
| 1945 Barclay Perkins XX | ||
| mild malt | 3.75 lb | 55.35% |
| amber malt | 0.67 lb | 9.89% |
| crystal malt 60 L | 0.50 lb | 7.38% |
| flaked barley | 0.67 lb | 9.89% |
| malt extract | 0.125 lb | 1.85% |
| No. 3 invert sugar | 1.00 lb | 14.76% |
| caramel 1000 SRM | 0.06 lb | 0.89% |
| Fuggles 90 mins | 0.50 oz | |
| Fuggles 60 mins | 0.50 oz | |
| Fuggles 30 mins | 0.25 oz | |
| OG | 1031.5 | |
| FG | 1010 | |
| ABV | 2.84 | |
| Apparent attenuation | 68.25% | |
| IBU | 14 | |
| SRM | 20 | |
| Mash at | 150º F | |
| Sparge at | 165º F | |
| Boil time | 90 minutes | |
| pitching temp | 60.5º F | |
| Yeast | Wyeast 1099 Whitbread Ale | |
Bavarian Weissbier
It’s odd how often I forget one type of German top-fermenting beer: Bavarian Weissbier. Especially as it’s by far the most popular sort.
Maybe it’s because it comes from the South, which I associate with Lager brewing. Whatever the reason, it is a little strange. Time to put that right.
Searching through my various spreadsheets, I see that I’ve a rather limited number of analyses of this type of wheat beer. I suppose I shouldn’t be that surprised. This type Weissbier was quite obscure in the 19th century, produced by a small number of breweries in pretty small quantities. It’s only in the last 30 years of so that the style has been available throughout Germany.
It also used to be exclusively brewed by specialist outfits. Now a large percentage of Bavarian breweries, ones that originally only brewed bottom-fermenting beers. It’s simple economics. The market for Weissbier has been expanding and brewers don’t want to miss out. Weissbier’s share rose from less than 2% in 1981 to almost 8% in 2010. In the southern States, Baden Württemberg and Bavaria, the market share is more than double that.
Here are the few analyses from the 19th century that I have:
What can we learn from that? The OGs are pretty low, as is the rate of attenuation. But how they compare to today? Let’s take a look:
Now isn’t that interesting? The average OG is almost identical. You couldn’t say that about many styles when comparing the 19th century to today. But the big difference in the rate of attenuation means that modern versions 0.75% ABV stronger on average. That isn’t a surprise. One of the biggest changes in German beer is the increased rate of attenuation.
In many styles this has been accompanied by a drop in OG. If you look at Pils, the rate of attenuation has increased, but the ABV has remained the same. With the system in place in Germany, where the tax is calculated on the OG of the beer, there’s a financial incentive to keep the OG as low as you can. No surprise that that’s exactly what breweries have done.
Weizenbock next.
Maybe it’s because it comes from the South, which I associate with Lager brewing. Whatever the reason, it is a little strange. Time to put that right.
Searching through my various spreadsheets, I see that I’ve a rather limited number of analyses of this type of wheat beer. I suppose I shouldn’t be that surprised. This type Weissbier was quite obscure in the 19th century, produced by a small number of breweries in pretty small quantities. It’s only in the last 30 years of so that the style has been available throughout Germany.
It also used to be exclusively brewed by specialist outfits. Now a large percentage of Bavarian breweries, ones that originally only brewed bottom-fermenting beers. It’s simple economics. The market for Weissbier has been expanding and brewers don’t want to miss out. Weissbier’s share rose from less than 2% in 1981 to almost 8% in 2010. In the southern States, Baden Württemberg and Bavaria, the market share is more than double that.
| German beer sales by type 1981 - 2010 | ||||||||
| Beer type | 1981 | 1989 | 1994 | 2000 | 2003 | 2005 | 2008 | 2010 |
| Pils | 48.5 | 57.5 | 66 | 67.9 | 62 | 57.9 | 55.2 | 55.1 |
| Export/Edel/Spezial | 20.8 | 10.9 | 9.7 | 9 | 9.6 | 10.4 | 9.8 | 9.8 |
| Weizen | 1.4 | 4.9 | 4.8 | 5.7 | 7.1 | 7.9 | 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Sources: | ||||||||
| Brauwelt Brevier 2003 | ||||||||
| Deutscher Brauer-Bund, Bonn | ||||||||
| Brauwelt nr. 46-47 (2006) page 1431 | ||||||||
Here are the few analyses from the 19th century that I have:
| Bavarian Weissbier 1866 - 1899 | |||||||||
| Year | Brewer | Town | Beer | OG Plato | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | Acidity |
| 1866 | Unknown | Munich | Weissbier | 11.62 | 1046.6 | 1012.9 | 4.38 | 72.32% | |
| 1888 | Röckl | Munich | Weissbier | 12.38 | 1049.8 | 1014 | 4.65 | 71.89% | 0.158 |
| 1888 | Schneider | Munich | Weissbier | 12.52 | 1050.4 | 1015.9 | 4.46 | 68.45% | 0.171 |
| 1888 | Schramm | Munich | Weissbier | 12.99 | 1052.4 | 1016.2 | 4.69 | 69.08% | 0.149 |
| 1899 | Unknown | Munich | Weissbier | 12.59 | 1050.7 | 1016.4 | 4.44 | 67.65% | |
| Average | 12.42 | 1050.0 | 1015.1 | 4.52 | 69.88% | 0.159 | |||
| Source: | |||||||||
| König, J (1903), Bier in Chemie der menschlichen Nahrungs- und Genussmittel by Joseph König, 1903, pp 1101 - 1156, Julius Springer, Berlin. | |||||||||
What can we learn from that? The OGs are pretty low, as is the rate of attenuation. But how they compare to today? Let’s take a look:
| Bavarian Hefeweizen in 2014 | |||||||
| Brewer | Town | Beer | OG Plato | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation |
| Ammerndorfer Bier Dorn Bräu | Ammerndorf | Hefe Weisse | 13.2 | 1053.3 | 1014 | 5.10 | 73.72% |
| Hermann Sigwart | Weißenburg | Kirchweihweizen | 13.2 | 1053.3 | 1011.1 | 5.50 | 79.17% |
| Hermann Sigwart | Weißenburg | Weißenburger Weiße | 12.9 | 1052.0 | 1012.8 | 5.10 | 75.39% |
| Göller | Zeil am Main | Steinhauer Weisse | 12.8 | 1051.6 | 1010.2 | 5.40 | 80.32% |
| Püls-bräu | Stadtsteinach | Weismainer Weisse | 12.8 | 1051.6 | 1011.6 | 5.20 | 77.51% |
| Brauerei Kanone Löhr | Schnaittach | Weizen (hell) | 12.8 | 1051.6 | 1013.9 | 4.90 | 73.15% |
| Weihenstephan | Freising | Hefeweissbier Leicht | 12.7 | 1051.2 | 1010.5 | 5.30 | 79.48% |
| Arnsteiner Brauerei | Seinsheim | Hefe-Weissbier | 12.7 | 1051.2 | 1012.7 | 5.00 | 75.18% |
| Kulmbacher Brauerei | Kulmbach | Hefeweissbier Leicht | 12.7 | 1051.2 | 1010.5 | 5.30 | 79.48% |
| Kitzmann-Bräu | Erlangen | Weißbier | 12.6 | 1050.7 | 1007.9 | 5.60 | 84.53% |
| Paulaner | Munich | Hefe-Weißbier Naturtrüb | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1008.2 | 5.50 | 83.70% |
| Hacker-Pschorr | Munich | Hefe Weisse | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1008.2 | 5.50 | 83.70% |
| Hacker-Pschorr | Munich | Sternweisse | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1008.2 | 5.50 | 83.70% |
| Klosterbrauerei Andechs | Andechs | Weissbier Hell | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1008.2 | 5.50 | 83.70% |
| Göller | Zeil am Main | Kaiser Heinrich Urweisse hell | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1010.4 | 5.20 | 79.43% |
| Distelhäuser | Tauberbischofsheim | Hefeweizen | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1008.9 | 5.40 | 82.31% |
| Brauhaus Leikeim | Altenkunstadt | Steinweisse | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1008.2 | 5.50 | 83.70% |
| Brauerei Reblitz | Bad Staffelstein | Nedensdorfer Hefeweizen | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1012.6 | 4.90 | 74.96% |
| Hermann Sigwart | Weißenburg | Hefe-Weizen | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1012.6 | 4.90 | 74.96% |
| Bürgerbräu Hersbruck | Hersbruck | Albweizen | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1011.1 | 5.10 | 77.94% |
| Brauerei Hofmann | Pahres | Weißbier | 12.4 | 1049.9 | 1010 | 5.20 | 79.96% |
| Brauhaus Leikeim | Altenkunstadt | Helle Weiße | 12.3 | 1049.5 | 1008.1 | 5.40 | 83.63% |
| Pyraser Landbrauerei | Thalmässing | Angerwirts Weizen | 12.2 | 1049.1 | 1009.2 | 5.20 | 81.35% |
| Albertshöfer Sternbräu | Albertshofen | Weizenbier | 12.1 | 1048.6 | 1010.2 | 5.00 | 79.03% |
| Privatbrauerei Kesselring | Marktsteft | Schlemmer Weißbier | 12 | 1048.2 | 1007.6 | 5.30 | 84.24% |
| Braugasthof Grosch | Rödental | Grosch Weissbier | 12 | 1048.2 | 1009.8 | 5.00 | 79.67% |
| Löwenbräu | Munich | Weisse | 11.8 | 1047.4 | 1007.5 | 5.20 | 84.17% |
| Wolf | Zeil am Main | Land Weisse | 11.6 | 1046.5 | 1008.2 | 5.00 | 82.38% |
| Zum Löwenbräu Flair Hotel | Adelsdorf | Aischgründer Karpfen-Weisse | 12.9 | 1052.0 | 1011.3 | 5.30 | 78.27% |
| Average | 12.5 | 1050.3 | 1010.1 | 5.24 | 79.96% | ||
| Sources: | |||||||
| The relevant brewery websites | |||||||
Now isn’t that interesting? The average OG is almost identical. You couldn’t say that about many styles when comparing the 19th century to today. But the big difference in the rate of attenuation means that modern versions 0.75% ABV stronger on average. That isn’t a surprise. One of the biggest changes in German beer is the increased rate of attenuation.
In many styles this has been accompanied by a drop in OG. If you look at Pils, the rate of attenuation has increased, but the ABV has remained the same. With the system in place in Germany, where the tax is calculated on the OG of the beer, there’s a financial incentive to keep the OG as low as you can. No surprise that that’s exactly what breweries have done.
Weizenbock next.
German Export Dunkles 1878 - 1900
I’ve got a stack of analyses extracted from “Chemie der menschlichen Nahrungs- und Genussmittel” that I’ve never done anything with. Time to put that right.
I’ve always had a soft spot for a Dunkles, myself. Or Lager Dark Mild as I like to call it. Though. Sadly, it’s been in decline for decades. In Munich, where it was the most popular style until WW II, it’s no longer universally available. It’s deeply unfashionable, just like Mild. Though there are pockets of popularity in Franconia.
But Dunkles wasn’t just Dunkles. Forgetting Bock and Doppelbock for the moment, it came in two major types: Dunkles Lagerbier and Export Dunkles. The difference between the two being their strength. Lagerbier being 11-13º Plato and Export being 13-15º Plato. Or so. There was no style police at the time, so these numbers are approximate.
The 39 samples have an average OG of 1058.2º, or 14.39º Plato. Which is about what I would expect. But there are a few outliers, notably the examples from Kulmbach which have a gravity more in line with a Bockbier. I’d expect that, as the Dark Lagers from Kulmbach were well known for being strong.
The degree of attenuation varies considerably, too. The average of 67% is about what I would expect. I’ve noticed that the attenuation of 19th-century Lagers was often quite poor. I’m more surprised by the ones over 75% than by the ones under 60%.
I'm shocked by how high the acidity of most examples is. I'd expect a Lager to be well below 0.1%.
You’ll probably recognise some of the names as several of the still extant Munich breweries are included, like Spaten and Löwenbräu. I’d love to know what these beers tasted like. Probably right down my street: big, chewy, malty beers.
I’ve always had a soft spot for a Dunkles, myself. Or Lager Dark Mild as I like to call it. Though. Sadly, it’s been in decline for decades. In Munich, where it was the most popular style until WW II, it’s no longer universally available. It’s deeply unfashionable, just like Mild. Though there are pockets of popularity in Franconia.
But Dunkles wasn’t just Dunkles. Forgetting Bock and Doppelbock for the moment, it came in two major types: Dunkles Lagerbier and Export Dunkles. The difference between the two being their strength. Lagerbier being 11-13º Plato and Export being 13-15º Plato. Or so. There was no style police at the time, so these numbers are approximate.
The 39 samples have an average OG of 1058.2º, or 14.39º Plato. Which is about what I would expect. But there are a few outliers, notably the examples from Kulmbach which have a gravity more in line with a Bockbier. I’d expect that, as the Dark Lagers from Kulmbach were well known for being strong.
The degree of attenuation varies considerably, too. The average of 67% is about what I would expect. I’ve noticed that the attenuation of 19th-century Lagers was often quite poor. I’m more surprised by the ones over 75% than by the ones under 60%.
I'm shocked by how high the acidity of most examples is. I'd expect a Lager to be well below 0.1%.
You’ll probably recognise some of the names as several of the still extant Munich breweries are included, like Spaten and Löwenbräu. I’d love to know what these beers tasted like. Probably right down my street: big, chewy, malty beers.
| German Export Dunkles 1878 - 1900 | ||||||||
| Year | Brewer | Town | Beer | OG | FG | ABV | App. Atten-uation | Lactic acid % |
| 1878 | Puszta | Kulmbach | Export Dunkel | 1053.2 | 1018.2 | 4.53 | 65.79% | 0.13 |
| 1878 | Unknown | Nürnberg | Export braun | 1055.4 | 1018.0 | 4.84 | 67.48% | |
| 1878 | Unknown | Nürnberg | Export braun | 1063.4 | 1021.0 | 5.50 | 66.88% | |
| 1884 | Aktien-Export-Brauhaus | Kulmbach | dunkeles Export | 1067.6 | 1025.9 | 5.39 | 61.69% | 0.18 |
| 1884 | Henninger | Erlangen | dunkeles Export | 1058.8 | 1014.5 | 5.76 | 75.34% | 0.148 |
| 1884 | Carl Niklass | Erlangen | dunkeles Export | 1063.3 | 1020.0 | 5.61 | 68.40% | 0.127 |
| 1884 | Kubra | Kyffhäuser | dunkeles Export | 1050.8 | 1014.4 | 4.73 | 71.65% | 0.135 |
| 1884 | Unknown | Kulmbach | dunkeles Export | 1061.9 | 1024.0 | 4.90 | 61.23% | 0.153 |
| 1884 | Spaten | Munich | dunkeles Export | 1049.7 | 1022.0 | 3.56 | 55.69% | 0.099 |
| 1891 | National-Aktien-Brauerei | Braunschweig | "Münchener" Export | 1056.5 | 1017.8 | 5.01 | 68.50% | |
| 1891 | National-Aktien-Brauerei | Braunschweig | "Kulmbacher" Export | 1061.0 | 1020.2 | 5.29 | 66.89% | |
| 1891 | Aktien-Brauerei Streitberg | Streitberg | "Löwenbier" | 1064.2 | 1013.5 | 6.63 | 78.97% | |
| 1891 | Unknown | Kulmbach | dunkeles Exportbier | 1065.7 | 1027.9 | 4.88 | 57.53% | 0.137 |
| 1891 | Unknown | Kulmbach | dunkeles Exportbier | 1067.6 | 1023.0 | 5.78 | 65.98% | 0.142 |
| 1891 | Bergische Brauerei-Gesellschaft | Elberfeld | Münchener Exportbier | 1053.6 | 1011.0 | 5.55 | 79.48% | 0.126 |
| 1891 | Gambrinusbräu, Böhmisches Brauhaus | Berlin | Münchener Exportbier | 1052.5 | 1020.3 | 4.16 | 61.33% | 0.117 |
| 1891 | Munkebräu Exp.-Br. | Flensburg | Münchener Exportbier | 1052.4 | 1017.6 | 4.50 | 66.41% | 0.151 |
| 1891 | Exp.-Br. Bamberg | Bamberg | Münchener Exportbier | 1057.2 | 1016.8 | 5.23 | 70.63% | 0.173 |
| 1891 | Gaardener Exp.-Br. | Gaarden bei Kiel | Prälatenbräu | 1053.9 | 1011.9 | 5.46 | 77.90% | 0.12 |
| 1891 | Hansa-Br. Gesellschaft | Hamburg | Münchener Exportbier | 1053.6 | 1015 | 5.01 | 72.01% | 0.129 |
| 1891 | Andr. Müller, Exp.-Br. | Bremen | Münchener Exportbier | 1054.8 | 1010.3 | 5.80 | 81.20% | 0.144 |
| 1891 | W. Remmer | Bremen | Münchener Exportbier | 1061.3 | 1016.3 | 5.85 | 73.41% | 0.145 |
| 1891 | Pschorrbräu | Munich | Münchener Exportbier | 1056.3 | 1018.9 | 4.84 | 66.43% | |
| 1891 | Löwenbräu | Munich | Münchener Exportbier | 1056.5 | 1023.4 | 4.26 | 58.58% | |
| 1891 | Leistbräu (Franziskaner) | Munich | Münchener Exportbier | 1057.6 | 1023 | 4.46 | 60.07% | |
| 1891 | Hackerbräu | Munich | Münchener Exportbier | 1057.5 | 1020.1 | 4.84 | 65.04% | |
| 1891 | Bürgerbräu | Munich | Münchener Exportbier | 1057.6 | 1024.1 | 4.31 | 58.16% | |
| 1891 | Metzgerbräu | Munich | Münchener Exportbier | 1057.1 | 1019.7 | 4.84 | 65.50% | |
| 1892 | Prschorrbräu | Munich | dunkeles Export | 1058.6 | 1020.3 | 4.95 | 65.33% | 0.162 |
| 1893 | Spaten | Munich | Spatenbräu | 1055.3 | 1015.3 | 5.20 | 72.33% | |
| 1893 | Spaten | Munich | Exportbier | 1056.2 | 1013.9 | 5.50 | 75.27% | |
| 1893 | Aktien-Export-Brauerei | Kulmbach | dunkeles Exportbier | 1076.9 | 1025.8 | 6.63 | 66.45% | |
| 1893 | Weihenstephan | Freising | Exportbier | 1056.2 | 1024.7 | 4.05 | 56.05% | |
| 1893 | Henninger | Erlangen | Exportbier | 1060.9 | 1022.6 | 4.95 | 62.89% | 0.281 |
| 1894 | Spaten | Munich | Exportbier | 1060.3 | 1020.1 | 5.21 | 66.67% | 0.180 |
| 1898 | Unknown | Munich | Export | 1055.0 | 1019 | 4.66 | 65.45% | |
| 1898 | Unknown | Munich | Export | 1058.1 | 1019.3 | 5.03 | 66.78% | |
| 1898 | Unknown | Nürnberg | Export | 1053.5 | 1016.9 | 4.74 | 68.41% | |
| 1900 | Spaten | Munich | Exportbier | 1058.1 | 1020 | 4.93 | 65.58% | 0.160 |
| Average | 1058.2 | 1019.1 | 5.06 | 67.16% | 0.149 | |||
| Source: | ||||||||
| König, J (1903), Bier in Chemie der menschlichen Nahrungs- und Genussmittel by Joseph König, 1903, pp 1101 - 1156, Julius Springer, Berlin. | ||||||||
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






